Gibson v. Hubbard
This text of 57 P. 88 (Gibson v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claim and delivery. This appeal must be dismissed. The brief contains no specification of errors relied upon, as required by Subdivision 3, Kule V, of this Court (44 Pac. vii). The appeal is brought directly within the announcement made last year in Beck v. O'Connor, 21 Mont. 109, 53 Pac. 94, that such an utter disregard of the rules of the Court would be punished by a dismissal of the appeal. As well put by Chief Justice Pemberton, “We must either punish such seeming contempt for the rules or abolish them.” (Beck v. O'Connor, supra; Babcock v. Caldwell, ante, p. 460, 56 Pac. 1081).
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 P. 88, 22 Mont. 517, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-hubbard-mont-1899.