Anderson v. Carlson

Montana Supreme Court

Anderson v. Carlson

57 P. 439, 23 Mont. 43, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 72

Montana Supreme Court·Decided June 12, 1899·No. No. 1,244·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— The defendant appeals from a judgment-against him, and from an order refusing a new trial. The [44]*44plaintiff moves a dismissal of the appeals upon the ground that the brief of the defendant does not conform to Subdivision 3 of Rule V of this court. Inspection of the brief discloses neither specification of errors, nor abstract, nor statement of the case. The appeals must therefore, under the authority of Gibson v. Hubbard, 22 Mont. 517, 57 Pac. 88, and of the cases therein cited, be dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brantly, being disqualified, took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

— The defendant appeals from a judgment-against him, and from an order refusing a new trial. The [44]*44plaintiff moves a dismissal of the appeals upon the ground that the brief of the defendant does not conform to Subdivision 3 of Rule V of this court. Inspection of the brief discloses neither specification of errors, nor abstract, nor statement of the case. The appeals must therefore, under the authority of Gibson v. Hubbard, 22 Mont. 517, 57 Pac. 88, and of the cases therein cited, be dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brantly, being disqualified, took no part in this decision.

Anderson v. Carlson, 57 P. 439, 23 Mont. 43, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 72 (Mo. 1899).

Pincite

57 P. 439 (Anderson v. Carlson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related