Anderson v. Carlson
This text of 57 P. 439 (Anderson v. Carlson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The defendant appeals from a judgment-against him, and from an order refusing a new trial. The [44]*44plaintiff moves a dismissal of the appeals upon the ground that the brief of the defendant does not conform to Subdivision 3 of Rule V of this court. Inspection of the brief discloses neither specification of errors, nor abstract, nor statement of the case. The appeals must therefore, under the authority of Gibson v. Hubbard, 22 Mont. 517, 57 Pac. 88, and of the cases therein cited, be dismissed; and it is so ordered.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 P. 439, 23 Mont. 43, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-carlson-mont-1899.