Gibson Paul v. State
149 So. 3d 117, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14366, 2014 WL 4626861
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gibson Paul v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16789 →
Opinion
Because appellant’s related criminal case is currently the subject of a direct appeal, we affirm the circuit court’s denial of his motion to return property seized at the time of his arrest. Cf. McKeever' v. State, 764 So.2d 688, 689 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (observing that once the “direct appeal concludes[,] ... the trial court cannot rely on the state’s unsupported assertion that it needs to retain private property.”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gibson Paul v. State, 149 So. 3d 117, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14366, 2014 WL 4626861 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
149 So. 3d 117 (Gibson Paul v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKeever v. State
764 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)