Gibson Paul v. State

149 So. 3d 117, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14366, 2014 WL 4626861
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 2014
Docket4D12-2418
StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 3d 117 (Gibson Paul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson Paul v. State, 149 So. 3d 117, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14366, 2014 WL 4626861 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because appellant’s related criminal case is currently the subject of a direct appeal, we affirm the circuit court’s denial of his motion to return property seized at the time of his arrest. Cf. McKeever' v. State, 764 So.2d 688, 689 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (observing that once the “direct appeal concludes[,] ... the trial court cannot rely on the state’s unsupported assertion that it needs to retain private property.”).

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKeever v. State
764 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 3d 117, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14366, 2014 WL 4626861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-paul-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.