Gibson Paul v. State
This text of 149 So. 3d 117 (Gibson Paul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because appellant’s related criminal case is currently the subject of a direct appeal, we affirm the circuit court’s denial of his motion to return property seized at the time of his arrest. Cf. McKeever' v. State, 764 So.2d 688, 689 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (observing that once the “direct appeal concludes[,] ... the trial court cannot rely on the state’s unsupported assertion that it needs to retain private property.”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 So. 3d 117, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14366, 2014 WL 4626861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-paul-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.