Gianoni Revocable Tr. v. Bristol G.M., No. X03 Cv-99-0496551 (Dec. 16, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 16582
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedDecember 16, 2002
DocketNo. X03 CV-99-0496551
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 16582 (Gianoni Revocable Tr. v. Bristol G.M., No. X03 Cv-99-0496551 (Dec. 16, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gianoni Revocable Tr. v. Bristol G.M., No. X03 Cv-99-0496551 (Dec. 16, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 16582 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
The above-captioned case started as an action for dissolution of the defendant Bristol General Manufacturing Holding Co., Inc. ("Bristol Holding") based on corporate director deadlock. When the action started the Achille Gianoni Revocable Trust (the "Trust") owned all of the preferred stock (1000 shares) of Bristol Holding and John and Thomas Gianoni owned all of the common stock of that corporation. Shortly after the commencement of this action, John Gianoni purchased all of the common stock of Thomas and then elected to purchase all of the preferred stock from the Trust pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 33-900 (d). After John Gianoni filed the election to purchase the shares the of Bristol Holding, the parties were unable to agree on a value for the preferred stock. Connecticut General Statutes § 33-900 (d) provides that the court shall determine value of shares if the parties cannot reach an agreement thereon. Therefore, the issues before this court are now: what was the value of the preferred stock of Bristol Holding on July 8, 1999, the day before the Complaint in this action was served; and, what are the terms under which John Gianoni must purchase the shares of preferred stock.

After a trial the court finds as follows. Prior to 1986 Bristol General Manufacturing Company, Incorporated was owned by Achille Gianoni. Achille and his wife, Alda, had seven children, two of whom were active in the business. Sometime in 1986, Achille Gianoni decided that he wanted to retire and transfer the business to the two sons that worked in business, John and Thomas Gianoni. This was accomplished through series of transactions described below.

In 1986, Achille Gianoni owned all of the stock in Bristol General Manufacturing Company, Incorporated. The device used to transfer ownership was the creation of Bristol General Manufacturing Holding Company, Inc. Achille transferred all of the common stock of Bristol General Manufacturing Company, Incorporated ("Operating Corporation") to CT Page 16583 Bristol General Manufacturing Holding Company, Inc. ("Holding Corporation").

The Holding Corporation was created with three classes of stock: common; class A common; and preferred. There is no dispute with respect to the common and class A common stock. Initially, Achille received all of the stock in the Holding Corporation in return for his transfer of all of the outstanding stock of the Operating Corporation to the Holding Corporation. Achille then owned all of the outstanding stock of the Holding Corporation (both the common and preferred stock) and the Holding Corporation owned all of the outstanding stock of the Operating Corporation.

The transfer the ownership of Bristol General from Achille to John and Thomas took place on August 14, 1986. The basic outline of the transfer was as follows: All of the common stock of the Holding Corporation was transferred to John and Thomas Gianoni (50% each) in return for promissory notes. The preferred stock consisted of 1000 shares with a par value of $350.00 each, for a total par value of $350,000.00. This equaled $50,000 per child for each of Achille's seven children. After the transfer of the Common and Class A Common, Achille still owned the preferred stock in the Holding Corporation, and he held the promissory notes which had been signed by John and Thomas in payment for their common and class A common stock.

There were two letter agreements, signed on August 14, 1986, which concerned the preferred stock. The first letter agreement dealt with the redemption of the preferred stock by the Holding Corporation. The second letter agreement dealt with the transfer by Achille of two sevenths of the preferred stock to John and Thomas. These letter agreements will be discussed in greater detail below.

In addition to transferring Bristol General to John and Thomas by means of transferring ownership of the Holding Corporation, on August 14, 1986, Achille Gianoni also executed the Achille Gianoni Revocable Trust Indenture (the "Trust") The Trust provided that Achille's wife, Alda, would receive all of the income from the Trust property during her lifetime. On Alda's death. all property of the Trust was to be transferred, in equal shares, to the seven children, with the proviso that if John and Thomas had already received their portions of the preferred stock in the Holding Corporation, then their shares of the Trust property were to be adjusted accordingly.

When Achille Gianoni died, the promissory notes which he received from John and Thomas as well as all of the preferred stock passed to the Trust CT Page 16584 under the terms of his will. The payment for the common stock is not an issue in this case. The Trust continues to hold all of the preferred stock.

After Achille Gianoni died in August of 1995, relations between John and Thomas Gianoni deteriorated. By 1999, John and Thomas Gianoni could no longer agree on the operation of the business. From 1986 through 1999 John had been President of the Bristol General and Thomas had been Vice President and Secretary. Thomas attempted to lock John Gianoni out of the business and was temporarily successful. However, John ultimately retook possession of the business, rehired the employees and continued running the business. This lockout is the subject of another suit which is not now before the court. In addition to locking out John Gianoni, the Trust brought an action under Connecticut General Statutes, § 33-896, seeking to dissolve the corporation. Under Connecticut General Statutes, § 33-900 (a), John elected to purchase the shares owned by the Trust. Since the parties could not agree on a value for the preferred stock, they seek this court's determination of the fair value of the preferred stock pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes, § 30-309 (d).

The attributes of the preferred stock are spelled out in the Articles of Incorporation of Bristol Holding, which provides that the authorized number of shares of preferred stock in that corporation are 1,000 and that the preferred stock has a par value of $350. It further provides:

Preferred Stock, par value $350. shall not be entitled to vote, shall have a noncumulative right to dividends of $35 per share before dividends are paid in any corporate fiscal year on the Common Stock and Class A Common Stock, shall be preferred in liquidation over the Common Stock and Class A Common Stock to the extent of its par value but shall not participate in liquidation beyond its par value and shall be callable at the option of the Corporation at its par value.

Emphasis added.

The preferred stock is non-voting. It is entitled to a dividend of 10% of its par value ($35.00/share) in any year in which the Holding Corporation pays a dividend to the holders of common stock. The right to dividends is non-cumulative. The holders of the preferred stock have no right to convert the preferred stock to common stock. Under the terms of the Articles of Incorporation, the holders of the preferred stock have no right to force the Holding Corporation to call or redeem the preferred stock. The Holding Corporation has the right to redeem or call some or CT Page 16585 all the preferred Stock at any time of the Holding Corporation's choosing at its par value ($350.00 per share).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 33-900
Connecticut § 33-900(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 16582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gianoni-revocable-tr-v-bristol-gm-no-x03-cv-99-0496551-dec-16-connsuperct-2002.