Gianformaggio v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
This text of 985 So. 2d 1119 (Gianformaggio v. Sears Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sylvia GIANFORMAGGIO, Appellant,
v.
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., a foreign corporation, and Cole Vision Corporation, a foreign corporation, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feiler & Leach and Martin E. Leach, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Arnstein & Lehr and Alfredo Marquez-Sterling, Miami, for appellee Sears Roebuck & Co.
Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer and Hinda Klein, Hollywood, for appellee Cole Vision Corporation.
Before LAGOA and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983); Burnette v. Grove Isle Club, Inc., 710 So.2d 80 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), review denied, 719 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 818, 120 S.Ct. 60, 145 L.Ed.2d 52 (1999); Davis Garden Estates, Inc. v. Am. Inv. Realty, Inc., 670 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Levine v. *1120 Del Am. Props., Inc., 642 So.2d 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
985 So. 2d 1119, 2008 WL 2116642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gianformaggio-v-sears-roebuck-co-fladistctapp-2008.