Burnette v. Grove Isle Club, Inc.

710 So. 2d 80, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3669, 1998 WL 158834
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1998·No. No. 97-265·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Given the clear record evidence of the appellant’s repeated failure to comply or inadequate compliance with numerous discovery orders after warning, we cannot find that the lower court abused its discretion in striking the appellant’s pleadings after it found that the noncompliance with these orders was willful. See Commonwealth Fed. Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271, 1273 (Fla.1990); Davis Garden Estates, Inc. v. American Inv. Realty, Inc., 670 So.2d 1180, 1181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Mack v. National Constructors, Inc., 666 So.2d 244, 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnette v. Grove Isle Club, Inc., 710 So. 2d 80, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3669, 1998 WL 158834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

710 So. 2d 80 (Burnette v. Grove Isle Club, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shary Ask v. Farhad Askarian
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Gianformaggio v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
985 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Thompson v. State
710 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)