Giandana v. Providence Rest Nursing Home

864 N.E.2d 606, 8 N.Y.3d 859
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against Providence Rest Nursing Home denied, and the certified question answered in the negative.

Under plaintiffs theory of liability, third-party defendant Akosah was the only witness to the alleged negligent acts involving decedent. Nonetheless, Akosah has yet to be deposed or to otherwise participate in discovery. CPLR 1008 grants a third-party defendant all “the rights of a party adverse to the other parties in the action, including the right to counter-claim, cross-claim and appeal.” In this appeal by third-party defendant Akosah, questions of fact relating to how decedent was injured, whether Akosah was involved, and whether the nursing home was otherwise negligent precluded a grant of partial summary judgment.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur in memorandum; Judge Jones taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giandana v. Providence Rest Nursing Home, 864 N.E.2d 606, 8 N.Y.3d 859 (N.Y. 2007).

864 N.E.2d 606 (Giandana v. Providence Rest Nursing Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hendricks
184 N.Y.S.3d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Montes v. New York City Transit Authority
46 A.D.3d 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Giandana v. Providence Rest Nursing Home
8 N.Y.3d 994 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)