Giandana v. Providence Rest Nursing Home
This text of 864 N.E.2d 606 (Giandana v. Providence Rest Nursing Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against Providence Rest Nursing Home denied, and the certified question answered in the negative.
Under plaintiffs theory of liability, third-party defendant Akosah was the only witness to the alleged negligent acts involving decedent. Nonetheless, Akosah has yet to be deposed or to otherwise participate in discovery. CPLR 1008 grants a third-party defendant all “the rights of a party adverse to the other parties in the action, including the right to counter-claim, cross-claim and appeal.” In this appeal by third-party defendant Akosah, questions of fact relating to how decedent was injured, whether Akosah was involved, and whether the nursing home was otherwise negligent precluded a grant of partial summary judgment.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur in memorandum; Judge Jones taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
864 N.E.2d 606, 8 N.Y.3d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giandana-v-providence-rest-nursing-home-ny-2007.