Ghartey v. Davidson
This text of 192 A.D.2d 304 (Ghartey v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Ciparick, J.), entered June 20, 1991, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly granted in the absence of proof of malice sufficient to overcome the qualified privilege under which the employee evaluation was prepared (see, Trails W. v Wolff, 32 NY2d 207, 221). Nor did plaintiff adduce any proof that any of the statements in issue were uttered negligently. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 A.D.2d 304, 595 N.Y.S.2d 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ghartey-v-davidson-nyappdiv-1993.