Gett v. McManus
47 Cal. 56
Opinion
The improvements erected by Gett, under the terms of the lease he obtained from Platt, became part of the freehold, and were the property of the lessor, and so passed by [58] his deed to McManus. There is nothing appearing in the circumstances of this case which could operate to change the character of the improvements in this respect or constitute them the mere personal chattels of the plaintiff.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gett v. McManus, 47 Cal. 56 (Cal. 1873).
47 Cal. 56 (Gett v. McManus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolfen v. Clinical Data, Inc.
16 Cal. App. 4th 171 (California Court of Appeal, 1993)
Roanoke Marble & Granite Co. v. Standard Gas & Oil Supply Co.
154 S.E. 518 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1930)
Boyd v. Douglass
48 A. 638 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1900)
Tunis Lumber Co. v. R. G. Dennis Lumber Co.
34 S.E. 613 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1899)