Geter v. State

115 So. 3d 385, 2013 WL 3197162, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10084

Opinions

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing en banc is denied. See Hernandez v. State, — So.3d -, 2012 WL 5869660 at *6 (Fla.2012); Anderson v. State, No. 5D12-4335, 2013 WL 183973, at *1 (Fla. 5th DCA Jan.15, 2013); Ferrell v. State, No. 5D12-4333, 2013 WL 183975, at *1 (Fla. 5th DCA Jan.15, 2013); Kennedy v. State, 106 So.3d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Gonzalez v. State, 101 So.3d 886, 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“We agree with the decision of the Third District in Geter v. State of Florida, [115 So.3d 375, 2012 WL 4448860 at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ], adopt its reasoning in its entirety, and hold that Miller should not be applied retroactively.”)

CORTINAS, ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ., concur.