Geter v. State
This text of 115 So. 3d 385 (Geter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The motion for rehearing en banc is denied. See Hernandez v. State, — So.3d -, 2012 WL 5869660 at *6 (Fla.2012); Anderson v. State, No. 5D12-4335, 2013 WL 183973, at *1 (Fla. 5th DCA Jan.15, 2013); Ferrell v. State, No. 5D12-4333, 2013 WL 183975, at *1 (Fla. 5th DCA Jan.15, 2013); Kennedy v. State, 106 So.3d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Gonzalez v. State, 101 So.3d 886, 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“We agree with the decision of the Third District in Geter v. State of Florida, [115 So.3d 375, 2012 WL 4448860 at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ], adopt its reasoning in its entirety, and hold that Miller should not be applied retroactively.”)
CORTINAS, ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 So. 3d 385, 2013 WL 3197162, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geter-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.