Gertzulin v. Gertzulin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gertzulin v. Gertzulin

27 A.D.3d 562, 810 N.Y.S.2d 355

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 A.D.3d 562 (Gertzulin v. Gertzulin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gertzulin v. Gertzulin, 27 A.D.3d 562, 810 N.Y.S.2d 355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child sup[563]*563port proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), dated May 6, 2005, which dismissed his objections to a temporary order of support of the same court (Miklitsch, S.M.), dated April 6, 2005.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; § 1112 [a]).

The order appealed from dismissed the father’s objections to a temporary order of support on the basis that such objections cannot be brought. As it is not an order of disposition, it is not appealable as of right (see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; § 1112 [a]; Matter of Ciotti v Butera, 24 AD2d 983 [1965]; see Firestone v Firestone, 44 AD2d 671, 672 [1974]). Adams, J.P., Santucci, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child sup[563]*563port proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), dated May 6, 2005, which dismissed his objections to a temporary order of support of the same court (Miklitsch, S.M.), dated April 6, 2005.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; § 1112 [a]).

The order appealed from dismissed the father’s objections to a temporary order of support on the basis that such objections cannot be brought. As it is not an order of disposition, it is not appealable as of right (see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; § 1112 [a]; Matter of Ciotti v Butera, 24 AD2d 983 [1965]; see Firestone v Firestone, 44 AD2d 671, 672 [1974]). Adams, J.P., Santucci, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.3d 562, 810 N.Y.S.2d 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gertzulin-v-gertzulin-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack