German Savings & Loan Society v. Ramish

69 P. 89, 138 Cal. 120, 1902 Cal. LEXIS 462
California Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1902·No. L.A. No. 995.·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinions

For the reasons given in the opinion delivered in this case in Department the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Van Dyke, J., Garoutte, J., McFarland, J., Henshaw, J.

The following is the opinion rendered in Department Two, on the third day of April, 1902: — *Page 122

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

German Savings & Loan Society v. Ramish, 69 P. 89, 138 Cal. 120, 1902 Cal. LEXIS 462 (Cal. 1902).

69 P. 89 (German Savings & Loan Society v. Ramish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir
470 P.3d 590 (California Supreme Court, 2020)
People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El Dorado
487 P.2d 1193 (California Supreme Court, 1971)
Miller v. McKenna
147 P.2d 531 (California Supreme Court, 1944)
Erie v. Piece of Land
14 A.2d 428 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Shannon v. Wilson
101 P.2d 116 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Puerto Rico v. Federal Land Bank
108 F.2d 275 (First Circuit, 1939)
Ambassador Holding Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
59 P.2d 1001 (California Supreme Court, 1936)
Collister, County Treas. v. Kovanda
199 N.E. 477 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)
Balaam v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.
28 P.2d 1053 (California Supreme Court, 1933)
Nalle v. Eaves
5 S.W.2d 500 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1928)
Farmers' State Bank of BurkburNett v. McReynolds
1 S.W.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
In Re Proposed Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.
242 P. 683 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1925)
Old Homestead Bakery, Inc. v. Marsh
242 P. 749 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
Richmond Wharf & Dock Co. v. Blake Brothers Co.
227 P. 223 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Chapman v. Rudolph
208 P. 370 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)
Reid v. Superior Court
186 P. 634 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. Young
182 P. 422 (California Supreme Court, 1919)
Guinn v. McReynolds
170 P. 421 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
Thomas v. Pridham
152 P. 933 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
Finnan v. Reclamation Dist. No. 273
148 P. 227 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)