German Masonic Temple Ass'n v. City of New York

18 N.E.2d 657, 279 N.Y. 452, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 878
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 10, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 18 N.E.2d 657 (German Masonic Temple Ass'n v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
German Masonic Temple Ass'n v. City of New York, 18 N.E.2d 657, 279 N.Y. 452, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 878 (N.Y. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the material allegations of the complaint are constructively admitted, there is no issue of fact and a declaratory judgment may appropriately be directed. (Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., v. City of New York, 276 N. Y. 198.)

We think that on the facts alleged by the pleading the plaintiff is not within the exemption for those charitable and religious institutions which are supported wholly or in part by public subscriptions or endowment *458 and are not organized or operated for profit.” (Local Law No. 29, 1935 [§ 1, If [h], § 2] and Local Law No. 31, 1936 [§ 1, If [h], § 2] of City of New York.) Concededly the plaintiff association is operated for profit. It is not enough that all its profits are devoted to the maintenance of an asylum which is purely charitable in character. The exemption does not extend to such a situation.

The judgments dismissing the complaint should be reversed and judgment directed for the defendants in accordance with this opinion, with costs in all courts.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur; O’Brien and Htjbbs, JJ., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simmons v. Lindstrom
2025 NY Slip Op 50460(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2025)
Great Homes Group, LLC v. GMAC Mtge., LLC
2020 NY Slip Op 1330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Jacobs v. Cartalemi
2017 NY Slip Op 8521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
DiGiorgio v. 1109-1113 Manhattan Avenue Partners, LLC
102 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Village of Woodbury v. Brach
99 A.D.3d 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Tilcon New York, Inc. v. Town of Poughkeepsie
87 A.D.3d 1148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Boryszewski v. Brydges
334 N.E.2d 579 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Meredith v. Monahan
60 Misc. 2d 1081 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Hunt v. Montgomery County
237 A.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1968)
Mandis v. Gorski
24 A.D.2d 181 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Shilbury v. Board of Supervisors
46 Misc. 2d 837 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Uniformed Fireman's Benevolent Ass'n v. Herten
23 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Martin v. State Liquor Authority
43 Misc. 2d 682 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Garcia v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
18 A.D.2d 62 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
City Denver v. Spears Free Clinic & Hospital for Poor Children
350 P.2d 1057 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)
Hellem v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
18 Misc. 2d 901 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Gordon v. O'Connell
14 Misc. 2d 598 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Wilson v. Board of Retirement
319 P.2d 426 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Civil Service Forum v. New York City Transit Authority
4 A.D.2d 117 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Hoffman v. City of Syracuse
141 N.E.2d 605 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 N.E.2d 657, 279 N.Y. 452, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/german-masonic-temple-assn-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1939.