Germain v. Shearin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Germain v. Shearin. Read the opinion of the Court — 430 F. App'x 220
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 23, 2011·No. 10-7722·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7722

JEAN BERNARD GERMAIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; JAMES HOLWAGER, Psychologist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-03097-JFM)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jean Bernard Germain, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jean Bernard Germain appeals the district court’s

order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing

Germain’s civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Germain v. Shearin,

No. 1:09-cv-03097-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Germain v. Shearin, (4th Cir. 2011).

Germain v. Shearin (Germain v. Shearin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.