Germain v. Shearin
This text of Germain v. Shearin (Germain v. Shearin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7722
JEAN BERNARD GERMAIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; JAMES HOLWAGER, Psychologist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-03097-JFM)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jean Bernard Germain, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jean Bernard Germain appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing
Germain’s civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Germain v. Shearin,
No. 1:09-cv-03097-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Germain v. Shearin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/germain-v-shearin-ca4-2011.