Gerald Stevens v. State
Opinion
ACCEPTED
03-15-00676-CV
8131239
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
12/8/2015 10:22:29 AM
JEFFREY D. KYLE
No. 03-15-00675-CV CLERK
No. 03-15-00676-CV
FILED IN
3rd COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
In the Third Court of Appeals 12/8/2015 10:22:29 AM Austin, Texas JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
GERALD STEVENS,
Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court-at-Law Number Five, Travis County, Texas
Trial Cause No. C-1-CR-15-100026
STATE’S BRIEF
DAVID A. ESCAMILLA
TRAVIS COUNTY ATTORNEY
GISELLE HORTON
ASSISTANT TRAVIS COUNTY ATTORNEY State Bar Number 10018000 Post Office Box 1748
Austin, Texas 78767
Telephone: (512) 854-9415 TCAppellate@traviscountytx.gov
December 8, 2015 ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ISSUE PRESENTED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ARGUMENT
Reply Point: The Court is without jurisdiction to hear Stevens’s interlocutory appeal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
PRAYER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
i
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Statutes Page TEX. CODE CRIM. P. art. 44.17 (West 2006). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Rules TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Cases Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
ii
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On March 27, 2015, a Travis County justice-court jury found Stevens guilty of speeding, and assessed punishment at a $200 fine. CR 11, 12.1 On
April 10th, he filed an appeal bond to appeal this Class C misdemeanor conviction to a Travis County court-at-law. CR 53.
On June 5th, Stevens filed with the county clerk a document entitled “Respondent’s Special Appearance and Plea to the Jurisdiction.” CR 57–87. Stevens now appeals the trial court’s adverse ruling on his “special appearance and plea to the jurisdiction.” CR 164 [adverse ruling]; CR 165–67 [Stevens’s “notice of interlocutory appeal”].
ISSUE PRESENTED
Did the county court-at-law err in failing to dismiss the criminal case against Stevens because the court was without personal or subject-matter jurisdiction, as he contends?
1 The record does not reflect whether the other Class C misdemeanor arising out of the same transaction went to trial in the justice court.
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT
This a an interlocutory matter that the Third Court does not have jurisdiction to review.
ARGUMENT
Reply Point: The Court is without jurisdiction to hear Stevens’s interlocutory appeal.
Appeal to county court from justice court is trial de novo. See TEX.
CODE CRIM. P. art. 44.17 (West 2006). Stevens has not had trial de novo in the county court-at-law, and therefore has not been convicted or sentenced in this criminal case. As a general rule, a court of appeals has jurisdiction to consider a criminal defendant’s appeal only where there has been a judgment of conviction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961). A court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to review rulings on interlocutory orders in a criminal case unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 51 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
No jurisdiction has been granted by law permitting the Court to interlocutorily review an order denying a “special appearance and plea to the jurisdiction” in a criminal case. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (concluding that appeal from pretrial order denying motion to suppress evidence was not immediately appealable and dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction).
PRAYER
For these reasons, on behalf of the State of Texas, the Travis County Attorney asks the Court to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Respectfully submitted,
DAVID A. ESCAMILLA
TRAVIS COUNTY ATTORNEY
Giselle Horton
Assistant Travis County Attorney State Bar Number 10018000 Post Office Box 1748
Austin, Texas 78767
Telephone: (512) 854-9415 TCAppellate@traviscountytx.gov
ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Relying on Corel WordPerfect’s word-count function, I certify that this document complies with the word-count limitations of TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4. The document contains 729 words.
Giselle Horton
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I have sent a complete and legible copy of this State's Brief via U.S. postage-prepaid mail to Mr. Gerald Stevens, at 3117 Fontana Drive, Austin, Texas 78704, on December 8, 2015.
Giselle Horton
Assistant Travis County Attorney
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerald Stevens v. State (Gerald Stevens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.