Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden

385 F.3d 1247, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21755, 2004 WL 2358247
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 2004
Docket97-99017
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 385 F.3d 1247 (Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden, 385 F.3d 1247, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21755, 2004 WL 2358247 (9th Cir. 2004).

Opinions

ORDER

The dissenting opinion of Judge B. Fletcher filed February 6, 2002, and cited at 280 F.3d 949, 977 (9th Cir.2002) (slip op. at 1866), is amended as follows:

(1) The first full paragraph at slip op. 1866 is deleted.

(2) The first sentence of the second paragraph at slip op. at 1866 is deleted.

(3) The phrase “With that caveat,” in the second sentence of the second paragraph at slip op. 1866 is deleted.

(4) Slip op. 1893, second paragraph, tenth line: add “(overruled on other grounds by Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002))” after Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 654, 110 S.Ct. 3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990).

(5) Slip op. 1899, second full paragraph, third line: add footnote reference 15 after the word mitigating. 15 The footnote shall read as follows:

15. Currently before the Idaho state court is Pizzuto’s petition for habeas relief based on his claim that under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), his mental retardation precludes imposition of the death penalty and execution. Pizzuto’s IQ is 72. Atkins notes that an “IQ between 70 and 75 or lower ... is typically considered the cutoff IQ score for the intellectual function prong of the mental retardation definition.” Id. at 309 n. 5, 122 S.Ct. 2242. The Court held that execution of such persons “is excessive” under the Eighth Amendment “and that the Constitution ‘places a substantive restriction on the State’s power to take the life’ of a mentally retarded offender.” Id. at 321, 122 S.Ct. 2242 (citation omitted). I would stay further proceedings pending the outcome of ongoing state proceedings. The majority has denied a stay and declines even to require the parties to advise us of the status of the state proceedings.

The majority opinion has not been amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pizzuto v. Richardson
D. Idaho, 2024
(HC) Thompson v. Bird
E.D. California, 2023
(HC) Wilson v. Covello
E.D. California, 2022
(HC) Williams v. Martel
E.D. California, 2021
(HC) Brown v. Robertson
E.D. California, 2021
(HC) Harlow v. Ndoh
E.D. California, 2021
(HC)Patterson v. Burton
E.D. California, 2020
(HC)Sanchez v. Martinez
E.D. California, 2020
(HC) Chavez v. Spearman
E.D. California, 2020
(HC) Walker v. Hatton
E.D. California, 2020
Rodney Berryman, Sr. v. Robert Wong
954 F.3d 1222 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Gerald Pizzuto, Jr. v. Al Ramirez
783 F.3d 1171 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
George Wharton v. Kevin Chappell
765 F.3d 953 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
State v. Timothy Alan Dunlap
313 P.3d 1 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2013)
State of Iowa v. Allen Bradley Clay
824 N.W.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2012)
Lang v. Cullen
725 F. Supp. 2d 925 (C.D. California, 2010)
Belmontes v. Ayers
529 F.3d 834 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Belmontes v. Brown
Ninth Circuit, 2008

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 F.3d 1247, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21755, 2004 WL 2358247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerald-ross-pizzuto-jr-v-aj-arave-warden-ca9-2004.