Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden

Ninth Circuit

Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden

345 F.3d 1119, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 11207, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8882, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20222, 2003 WL 22272568

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2003·No. 97-99017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Pizzuto seeks clarification of the time for filing a petition for rehearing in light of the fact that this court has rendered its decision in Summerlin v. Stewart, 341 F.3d 1082(9th Cir.2003) (en banc). The time for filing a petition for rehearing and/or petition for rehearing en banc is stayed until final disposition of Summerlin by the United States Supreme Court. Piz-zuto shall have 30 days from that date in which to seek rehearing in this court. Meanwhile, the opinion filed February 6, 2002 in this case may not be cited for precedential effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Pizzuto seeks clarification of the time for filing a petition for rehearing in light of the fact that this court has rendered its decision in Summerlin v. Stewart, 341 F.3d 1082(9th Cir.2003) (en banc). The time for filing a petition for rehearing and/or petition for rehearing en banc is stayed until final disposition of Summerlin by the United States Supreme Court. Piz-zuto shall have 30 days from that date in which to seek rehearing in this court. Meanwhile, the opinion filed February 6, 2002 in this case may not be cited for precedential effect.

Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden, 345 F.3d 1119, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 11207, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8882, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20222, 2003 WL 22272568 (9th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

345 F.3d 1119 (Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related