Gerald L. Anderson Family Trust v. Diamondback DTNM, LLC

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided January 14, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-00066·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO GERALD L. ANDERSON FAMILY TRUST, DATED JULY 22, 1993, Plaintiff, Vv. No. 2:24-cv-0066 DLM/GBW DIAMONDBACK DTNM, LLC, and DENNIS ECKSTROM, Defendants.

ORDER VACATING TRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte under the Court’s inherent power to manage its docket. See Bunn v. Perdue, 966 F.3d 1094, 1099 (10th Cir. 2020) (“District courts are afforded great discretion regarding control of the docket and parties.”) (quoting United States v. Orozco, 916 F.3d 919, 925 (10th Cir. 2019)); SEC v. Mgmt. Sols., Inc., 824 F. App’x 550, 553 (10th Cir. 2020) (“[A] district court has the inherent power to ‘manage [its] own affairs so as to achieve orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.’”) (quoting Dietz v. Bouldin, 579 U.S. 40, 45 (2016)). Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the previously scheduled trial scheduling conference. The Court will set a trial scheduling conference after Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth enters an order on the parties’ Joint Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference and Amend Scheduling Pretrial Scheduling Order. (Doc. 41.)

□ □□ pews Z Meg DAMIANL.MARTINEZ ————™ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerald L. Anderson Family Trust v. Diamondback DTNM, LLC, (D.N.M. 2025).

Gerald L. Anderson Family Trust v. Diamondback DTNM, LLC (Gerald L. Anderson Family Trust v. Diamondback DTNM, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dietz v. Bouldin
579 U.S. 40 (Supreme Court, 2016)
United States v. Orozco
916 F.3d 919 (Tenth Circuit, 2019)
Bunn v. Perdue
966 F.3d 1094 (Tenth Circuit, 2020)