Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Jones

49 S.E. 729, 121 Ga. 822, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 84
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 28, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

A railroad company is liable for any damage done to persons, stock, or other property by the running of its trains, unless the company shall make it appear that its agents exercised all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence; but a charge that “ where stock is upon the track or in danger of being killed, ordinary diligence and reasonable care would require the railroad company to do all that they could to slow up or stop their train, rather than to kill the stock,” is erroneous ; the definition given of ordinary care imposed extraordinary diligence on the company. W. & A. R. v. King, 70 Ga. 261. Judgment in each case reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Jones, 49 S.E. 729, 121 Ga. 822, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 84 (Ga. 1905).

49 S.E. 729 (Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Paulk
125 S.E. 865 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. White
59 S.E. 898 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)