Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. White
This text of 59 S.E. 898 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In a suit against a railroad company to recover damages for tlie negligent killing of live stock, a charge of the court which imposed upon the railroad company the exercise of all possible care to avoid the killing of such stock by the running of its trains, although the charge be in other parts of it correct on the measure of diligence required of such company, is cause for a new trial, especially in a case where the evidence is close. East T., V. & G. Ry. Co. v. Daniel, 91 Ga. 768; Atl. C. L. R. Co. v. Electric Light Co., 123 Ga. 613; Ga. So. & Fla. Ry. Co. v. Jones, 121 Ga. 822.
2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial do not show the commission of any error sufficiently material to require a reversal of the judgment of the court below.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 S.E. 898, 129 Ga. 668, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-v-white-ga-1907.