Georgia Receivables, Inc. v. Murray
This text of 524 S.E.2d 518 (Georgia Receivables, Inc. v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Georgia Receivables (plaintiff) brought a breach of contract action against Dorothy Murray (defendant) in the Superior Court of Richmond County. After defendant failed to respond to plaintiff’s complaint, the trial court entered a default judgment on December 10, 1998, during the November 1998 term of the Superior Court of Richmond County.1 On February 12, 1999, the trial court entered an order setting aside this default judgment, finding that the contract which is the subject of plaintiff’s complaint had been cancelled. The trial court later entered a final judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, and this appeal followed. Held:
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment based on the merits of its claim against defendant. We agree.
A trial court may exercise discretion in setting aside a default judgment within the same term of court. Piggly Wiggly Southern v. McCook, 216 Ga. App. 335, 337 (1) (454 SE2d 203). But after expiration of the term of court in which a default judgment is entered, the [677]*677trial court’s discretion in setting aside the default judgment is limited to the criteria set forth in OCGA § 9-11-60 (d). See Mitchell v. Speering, 239 Ga. App. 472, 473 (521 SE2d 419). This Code subsection provides:
A motion to set aside may be brought to set aside a judgment based upon: (1) [l]ack of jurisdiction over the person or the subject matter; (2) [flraud, accident, or mistake or the acts of the adverse party unmixed with the negligence or fault of the movant; or (3) [a] nonamendable defect which appears upon the face of the record or pleadings. Under this paragraph, it is not sufficient that the complaint or other pleading fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, but the pleadings must affirmatively show no claim in fact existed.
OCGA § 9-11-60 (d).
The record shows that the trial court did not consider these criteria in the case sub judice. It thus follows that, since the order setting aside the default judgment was entered outside the term of court in which the judgment was entered, the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to set aside the default judgment. Mitchell v. Speering, 239 Ga. App. at 473, supra. Compare Wright v. Archer, 210 Ga. App. 607 (436 SE2d 775).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
524 S.E.2d 518, 240 Ga. App. 676, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4173, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-receivables-inc-v-murray-gactapp-1999.