Georgia Pacific Railway v. Mayor of Douglasville

1 Ga. L. Rep. 47
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 47 (Georgia Pacific Railway v. Mayor of Douglasville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia Pacific Railway v. Mayor of Douglasville, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 47 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

1. After a bridge has been completed, it is too late to obtain an injunction to prevent its completion; and it is not within the power of a chancellor at chambers to grant a mandatory order requiring a municipal corporation to remodel or remove any part of a bridge forming a part of one of its streets. 20 Ga., 126, 134, (2); Code §2002,

2. The testimony as to the safety of the bridge in controversy being conflicting, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing an injunction.

(a.) On the final trial, the question of the duty of the municipal corporation to build the bridge for the convenience of the citizens, and the propriety of'modifying it may be determined and a verdict rendered accordingly; and if it be the duty of the railroad company to erect and make a suitable bridge where the street of the town crosses it, [48]*48it is not necessary for the town to proceed against it for the expenses of the bridge and the cost of remodeling it. The equities of all the parties may be determined on the trial of this case.

J. S. James, for plaintiff in error. W. A. James; C. D. Camp, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Hawkins
20 Ga. 126 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-pacific-railway-v-mayor-of-douglasville-ga-1885.