Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Sheppard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Sheppard

59 S.E. 717, 3 Ga. App. 241, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 609

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 9, 1907

Docket715

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 S.E. 717 (Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Sheppard, 59 S.E. 717, 3 Ga. App. 241, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 609 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

Sheppard sued the railway company in a justice’s court, for damages on account of the killing of two of his hogs in the running of its train. He verified his cause of action by an affidavit. The defendant was duly served, but failed to appear at the call of the case at the first term. The magistrate thereupon entered a judgment by default, in favor of the plaintiff, for the amount claimed in the summons. The railway company brought the case to the superior court by certiorari, on the ground that the judgment was rendered without any evidence. At the hearing the judge of the superior court overruled the certiorari, and-the railway company brings error.

In certain cases in justice’s courts, judgment b3r default may [242]*242be rendered upon the pleadings, without further proof. If the suit be an action upon an open account, duly verified by affidavit, the court shall give the plaintiff judgment unless the defendant files a plea likewise verified by written affidavit. Civil Code, §4130. So also, though suit on an unverified account may properly be defended by an unverified plea, yet, in such actions, if the defendant does not appear or plead at all, the magistrate may give judgment by default. Peeples v. Sethness Co., 119 Ga. 777 (47 S. E. 170); Parris v. Hightower, 76 Ga. 631 (2, b). A plaintiff can not, however, avail himself of the privileges of the rule above stated by setting out, in the form of an account, a cause of action, which in fact is not a liability on account, but of some other nature. Caudell v. Southern Ry. Co., 119 Ga. 21 (45 S. E. 712); Lowe Co. v. Central R. Co., 123 Ga. 712 (51 S. E. 653). In suits upon unconditional contracts in writing, where the defendant does not appear or plead at the first term, tlie magistrate should render judgment for the plaintiff without further proof than the writing itself. In other cases the plaintiff must introduce enough testimony to show a prima facie right to recover, before he is entitled to a judgment, although the defendant does not appear or plead. Maddox v. Central Ry. Co., 1 Ga. App. 46 (4), (57 S. E. 1062). The court, therefore, erred in not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

Sheppard sued the railway company in a justice’s court, for damages on account of the killing of two of his hogs in the running of its train. He verified his cause of action by an affidavit. The defendant was duly served, but failed to appear at the call of the case at the first term. The magistrate thereupon entered a judgment by default, in favor of the plaintiff, for the amount claimed in the summons. The railway company brought the case to the superior court by certiorari, on the ground that the judgment was rendered without any evidence. At the hearing the judge of the superior court overruled the certiorari, and-the railway company brings error.

In certain cases in justice’s courts, judgment b3r default may [242]*242be rendered upon the pleadings, without further proof. If the suit be an action upon an open account, duly verified by affidavit, the court shall give the plaintiff judgment unless the defendant files a plea likewise verified by written affidavit. Civil Code, §4130. So also, though suit on an unverified account may properly be defended by an unverified plea, yet, in such actions, if the defendant does not appear or plead at all, the magistrate may give judgment by default. Peeples v. Sethness Co., 119 Ga. 777 (47 S. E. 170); Parris v. Hightower, 76 Ga. 631 (2, b). A plaintiff can not, however, avail himself of the privileges of the rule above stated by setting out, in the form of an account, a cause of action, which in fact is not a liability on account, but of some other nature. Caudell v. Southern Ry. Co., 119 Ga. 21 (45 S. E. 712); Lowe Co. v. Central R. Co., 123 Ga. 712 (51 S. E. 653). In suits upon unconditional contracts in writing, where the defendant does not appear or plead at the first term, tlie magistrate should render judgment for the plaintiff without further proof than the writing itself. In other cases the plaintiff must introduce enough testimony to show a prima facie right to recover, before he is entitled to a judgment, although the defendant does not appear or plead. Maddox v. Central Ry. Co., 1 Ga. App. 46 (4), (57 S. E. 1062). The court, therefore, erred in not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 S.E. 717, 3 Ga. App. 241, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-florida-alabama-railway-co-v-sheppard-gactapp-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack