Caudell v. Southern Railway Co.

45 S.E. 712, 119 Ga. 21, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 4
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1903·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. Section 4130 of the Civil Code, which provides the mode of proof and defense in a suit in a justice’s court upon an open account, does not apply to an “ action for damage and loss or destruction of goods ” by a common carrier, although an itemized list of the articles and their values is attached to the summons and sworn to as correct.

2. The ruling to the contrary, made by the magistrate, involved only a question of law, and a certiorari from his decision was the proper remedy.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caudell v. Southern Railway Co., 45 S.E. 712, 119 Ga. 21, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 4 (Ga. 1903).

45 S.E. 712 (Caudell v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry Darling Inc. v. Harvey-Given Co.
151 S.E. 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Sheppard
59 S.E. 717 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Lowe Co. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
51 S.E. 653 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)