Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice v. Jeremiah Alexander Smart

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 13, 2014
DocketA13A2412
StatusPublished

This text of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice v. Jeremiah Alexander Smart (Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice v. Jeremiah Alexander Smart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice v. Jeremiah Alexander Smart, (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ March 13, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A13A2412. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE v. SMART.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s April 15, 2013 order directing the Department of Juvenile Justice to retain custody of the Appellee for the duration of his custodial sentence, which expired on December 28, 2013. Because the Appellee is no longer in custody and is now serving the probationary portion of his sentence, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT.1

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/13/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Although the Appellant contends that this issue should be reviewed despite its individual mootness based on the narrow exception of “capable of repetition, yet evading review,” this is not the type of case in which the facts of the subject matter are so elusive as to necessitate review in a case in which the issue no longer exists. See Bowers v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. Sys. of Ga., 259 Ga. 221, 222, n.1 (378 SE2d 460) (1989). Despite the Appellant’s contention that other orders of this nature have since been entered at the trial level, the Appellant has not shown that those cases involve sentences set to expire prior to the normal length of the appellate process, and accordingly, the contention that this issue will continue to “evade review” is without merit. See id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowers v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
378 S.E.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice v. Jeremiah Alexander Smart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-department-of-juvenile-justice-v-jeremiah-alexander-smart-gactapp-2014.