Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities v. Debra Williams
This text of Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities v. Debra Williams (Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities v. Debra Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ May 04, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16A1544. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES et al. v. DEBRA WILLIAMS et al.
A16A1545. CHATHAM ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, INC. v. DEBRA WILLIAMS et al.
Debra Williams, as next friend of Justin Williams, filed a negligence action against several defendants, including the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Health Services (“the Department”) and Chatham Association for Residential Services, Inc. (“Chatham Assoc.”). The Department filed a motion to dismiss on sovereign immunity grounds, and the trial court denied the motion. In Case Number A16A1544, the Department seeks to appeal this ruling in accordance with Board of Regents v. Canas, 295 Ga. App. 505 (672 SE2d 471) (2009), which held that the denial of a motion to dismiss on sovereign immunity grounds could be appealed directly as a collateral order. In Case Number A16A1545, Chatham Assoc. has filed a cross-appeal. In Rivera v. Washington, __ Ga. __ (Case Number S15G0887, decided March 25, 2016), the Supreme Court reversed our ruling in Canas, supra, holding that the denial of a motion to dismiss on sovereign immunity grounds is not a collateral order subject to direct appeal. See id. Because the Department failed to follow the interlocutory procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), the appeal in A16A1545 is hereby DISMISSED. See Crane v. State, 281 Ga. 635, 636-637 (641 SE2d 795) (2007). Under these circumstances, we must also dismiss Case Number A15A1545. “Although under OCGA § 5-6-48 (e), a cross-appeal may survive the dismissal of the main appeal, this is true only where the cross-appeal can stand on its own merit.” Patel v. Georgia Power Co., 234 Ga. App. 141, 142 (2) (505 SE2d 787) (1998) (punctuation omitted). Because Chatham Assoc. has no independent basis for establishing jurisdiction in this Court, the appeal in A16A1545 is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/04/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities v. Debra Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-department-of-behavioral-health-and-developmental-disabilities-v-gactapp-2016.