Georgetown & Silver Plume Road Co. v. Hutchinson

4 Colo. 50
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided December 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Elbert, J.

The failure of the board of county commissioners to make and keep a record of its actions prescribing rates of toll to be “ charged and collected ” by the plaintiff, could not prejudice the right of the plaintiff to charge and collect its tolls.

The absence of such record being made to appear, the plaintiff should have been allowed to show that application was made, and that its rates of toll had been, in fact, prescribed by the board, in compliance with the provisions of the statute.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law-'

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgetown & Silver Plume Road Co. v. Hutchinson, 4 Colo. 50 (Colo. 1877).

4 Colo. 50 (Georgetown & Silver Plume Road Co. v. Hutchinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peroulis v. Board of County Commissioners
665 P.2d 134 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1982)
Tallon v. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.
149 P. 108 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1915)
Mugrage v. People
26 Colo. App. 27 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1914)
Long v. Pierce County
61 P. 142 (Washington Supreme Court, 1900)