Georgetown & Silver Plume Road Co. v. Hutchinson

4 Colo. 50
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedDecember 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 4 Colo. 50 (Georgetown & Silver Plume Road Co. v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgetown & Silver Plume Road Co. v. Hutchinson, 4 Colo. 50 (Colo. 1877).

Opinion

Elbert, J.

The failure of the board of county commissioners to make and keep a record of its actions prescribing rates of toll to be “ charged and collected ” by the plaintiff, could not prejudice the right of the plaintiff to charge and collect its tolls.

The absence of such record being made to appear, the plaintiff should have been allowed to show that application was made, and that its rates of toll had been, in fact, prescribed by the board, in compliance with the provisions of the statute.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law-'

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peroulis v. Board of County Commissioners
665 P.2d 134 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1982)
Tallon v. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.
149 P. 108 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1915)
Mugrage v. People
26 Colo. App. 27 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1914)
Long v. Pierce County
61 P. 142 (Washington Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Colo. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgetown-silver-plume-road-co-v-hutchinson-colo-1877.