George Weintraub & Sons Inc. v. United States

855 F. Supp. 401, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 594, 18 C.I.T. 594
United States Court of International Trade·Decided June 24, 1994·No. 86-03-00417. Slip Op. No. 94-102·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

STIPULATED JUDGMENT ON AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS

MUSGRAVE, Judge.

These actions, as prescribed by Rule 58.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade, have been stipulated for judgment on agreed statement of facts in which the parties agree that:

The imported merchandise, consisting of merchandise invoiced as “men’s cotton suits,” covered by the entries on the attached schedule, is to be reliquidated with a refund to plaintiff of 75% of the difference in duties between the duties actually assessed by the Customs Service under the Column 2 rate of item 379.62, TSUS, of 37.5% ad val., and the duties under plaintiffs claimed provision, the Column 1 rate of item 379.62, TSUS, of 16.5% ad val It is further agreed that the refund of duties shall include any applicable statutory interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2644, from the date of the filings of the summonses, until the date(s) the refund is issued. It is further agreed that each party will bear their own costs, fees, and expenses.

All other claims are overruled.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appropriate Customs Service offieial(s) shall re-liquidate the entries accordingly; and it is further

ORDERED that the opinion and order of the Court of International Trade in Slip Opinion 88-92, dated July 15, 1988, 691 F.Supp. 1449, and the opinion and judgment in Slip Opinion 88-159, dated November 21, 1988, 703 F.Supp. 947, are now moot, and are hereby vacated and set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Weintraub & Sons Inc. v. United States, 855 F. Supp. 401, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 594, 18 C.I.T. 594 (cit 1994).

855 F. Supp. 401 (George Weintraub & Sons Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fujitsu Compound Semiconductor, Inc. v. United States
246 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Court of International Trade, 2003)
Xerox Corp. v. United States
219 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (Court of International Trade, 2002)
Executone Information Systems v. United States
19 Ct. Int'l Trade 960 (Court of International Trade, 1995)