George W. Palmer v. Howard M. Comstock
394 F.2d 395
Opinions
The district court’s judgment dismissing appellant’s petition for habeas corpus is affirmed on the ground that appellant has not exhausted available state remedies. Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George W. Palmer v. Howard M. Comstock, 394 F.2d 395 (9th Cir. 1968).
394 F.2d 395 (George W. Palmer v. Howard M. Comstock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Conley v. White
470 F. Supp. 1 (W.D. Missouri, 1979)
Harris v. Superior Court of State of California for the County of Los Angeles
500 F.2d 1124 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
Roger Marvin Williams v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, and the People of the State of California
431 F.2d 932 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Thomas A. Daboul v. Walter E. Craven, Warden
429 F.2d 164 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Pratt v. Botula
306 F. Supp. 1363 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1969)
Cabrera v. Smith
308 F. Supp. 389 (D. Vermont, 1969)
Kidd v. Coiner
299 F. Supp. 1380 (N.D. West Virginia, 1969)
Velton Watkins v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden
408 F.2d 351 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
George W. Palmer v. Howard M. Comstock
394 F.2d 395 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)