George v. Marcantel Feed Stores, Inc.

446 So. 2d 345
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 13, 1984
Docket83-51
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 446 So. 2d 345 (George v. Marcantel Feed Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George v. Marcantel Feed Stores, Inc., 446 So. 2d 345 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

446 So.2d 345 (1984)

Jerry GEORGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MARCANTEL FEED STORES, INC. and Fidelity & Casualty of New York, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 83-51.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

January 13, 1984.

Bass & Bass, Joe Bass and Edward Bass, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

Stockwell and Associates, John Bradford and Kirk Bergeron, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee.

Before DOUCET, YELVERTON and KNOLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In plaintiff's motion for clarification he questions whether our decree of August 1, 1983, 434 So.2d 440, provides for legal interest at twelve per cent per annum from the date of judicial demand on the $3,500 award of attorney's fee.

It is settled that appellate courts have the power to correct their judgments without the necessity of granting a rehearing to do so. State v. Wilco Construction Co., Inc., 398 So.2d 1150 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1981); Bink v. Blackwell, 432 So.2d 296 (La.App. 5th Cir.1983).

Plaintiff, Jerry George, is entitled to legal interest from date of judicial demand on the attorney's fees. Coulton v. Levitz Furniture Corp., 391 So.2d 80 (La.App. 4th Cir.1980); Negem v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 366 So.2d 194 (La.App. 2nd Cir. *346 1978); Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, 186 So.2d 328 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1966).

Accordingly, for purposes of clarification, our former decree is amended to read as follows: plaintiff, Jerry George, is entitled to legal interest from date of judicial demand on the attorney's fees.

In all other respects our original decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Loggers
685 So. 2d 559 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Jackson v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co.
676 So. 2d 716 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc.
676 So. 2d 1084 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Broussard v. West-Cal Const. Co., Inc.
676 So. 2d 743 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Hood v. CJ Rogers, Inc.
654 So. 2d 371 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)
Lacy v. PPG Industries, Inc.
640 So. 2d 655 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
Demarest v. Progressive American Ins. Co.
552 So. 2d 1329 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
Barton v. Wausau Ins. Co.
545 So. 2d 1248 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
Sharbono v. H & S CONST. CO.
478 So. 2d 779 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 So. 2d 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-marcantel-feed-stores-inc-lactapp-1984.