George v. Hannah

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1059

TIMOTHY R. GEORGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARY HANNAH; ANY AND ALL DOES, each in their individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-74-F-5)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 22, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy R. George, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Mary Roccapriore Pelletier, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Timothy R. George appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

George v. Hannah, No. CA-05-74-F-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -