George v. Hannah

180 F. App'x 482
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2006·No. No. 06-1059·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Timothy R. George appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See George v. Hannah, No. CA-05-74-F-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George v. Hannah, 180 F. App'x 482 (4th Cir. 2006).

180 F. App'x 482 (George v. Hannah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related