George Tolbert, Jr. v. Warden Bragan

451 F.2d 1020, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6939
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 1971
Docket71-2537
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 451 F.2d 1020 (George Tolbert, Jr. v. Warden Bragan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Tolbert, Jr. v. Warden Bragan, 451 F.2d 1020, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6939 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George Tolbert, Jr., appeals from the district court’s denial of leave to file his Civil Rights 1 complaint in forma paw-peris without requiring any responsive pleading of the defendants. We reverse and remand.

Tolbert is presently serving a sentence in a federal prison. He alleges that he was taken from there to the Jefferson County, Alabama, jail on a writ of ha-beas corpus ad prosequendum to answer state criminal charges against him. After disposition of these charges and while awaiting transportation back to federal prison, Tolbert alleges that five jailers beat him severely about the head and body with blackjacks, leaving him badly injured. He alleges that the beating was done under color of state law and racially motivated. Tolbert alleges that the white jailers beat him, a black man, “for sheer sport and/or to satisfy their racist egos.”

The district court held that these are “merely allegations of assault and battery and do not involve federal constitutional questions. These are matters which, if true, are within the province of prison officials or state courts of the State of Alabama.”

We do not agree. Tolbert has alleged more than a mere matter of prison administration or of state law. Severe physical abuse of prisoners by their keepers without cause or provocation is actionable under the Civil Rights Act. See Lowe v. Warden, 5 Cir. 1971, 450 F. 2d 9; Collum v. Butler, 7 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 1257; Allison v. California *1021 Adult Authority, 9 Cir. 1969, 419 F.2d 822; Wiltsie v. California Department of Corrections, 9 Cir. 1968, 406 F.2d 515.

The order of the district court denying Tolbert’s motion for leave to file his complaint in forma pauperis is reversed and the cause is remanded for further appropriate proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

1

. 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nolin v. Town of Springville
45 F. Supp. 2d 894 (N.D. Alabama, 1999)
Gilmere v. City of Atlanta
774 F.2d 1495 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Alan Kimbrough McFadden v. Eddie Lucas
713 F.2d 143 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Leon F. Rich v. George A. Zitnay, Etc.
644 F.2d 41 (First Circuit, 1981)
Ruiz v. Estelle
503 F. Supp. 1265 (S.D. Texas, 1980)
Isaac C. Dailey v. G.S. Byrnes
605 F.2d 858 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Martinez v. Rosado
474 F. Supp. 758 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Jones v. Hildebrant
432 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Levoy Jasper Meredith v. State of Arizona
523 F.2d 481 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Johnny Clemmons v. Officer Greggs
509 F.2d 1338 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Charles Cary Stokes
506 F.2d 771 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Polite v. Diehl
507 F.2d 119 (Third Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 F.2d 1020, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-tolbert-jr-v-warden-bragan-ca5-1971.