George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr
110 N.J.L. 455
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.J. Misc. 756 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255.
For affirmance — The Chahcellob, Chiee Justice, Paeicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr, 110 N.J.L. 455 (N.J. 1933).
110 N.J.L. 455 (George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.