George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr
166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 455, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 524
This text of 166 A. 166 (George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr, 166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 455, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 524 (N.J. 1933).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works,10 N.J. Mis. R. 255.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 456
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 455, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-palm-construction-co-v-bahr-nj-1933.