George Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 13, 2018
DocketA19A0066
StatusPublished

This text of George Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC (George Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 09, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0066. GEORGE LEDET v. VANDAMM ENTERPRISES, LLC.

George Ledet filed a complaint and request for injunctive relief against Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, Tower Lending, LLC, and Tower Financial Services, Inc., asserting, among other things, claims of adverse possession, constructive fraud, breach of contract, and trespass relating to a foreclosure and writ of possession. The trial court entered an order granting Vandamm Enterprises’s motion to dismiss, and Ledet filed this direct appeal from that order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment.” Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989) (punctuation omitted). In such circumstances, there must be either an express determination that there is no just reason for delay under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5- 6-34 (b). See id. “Where neither of these code sections [is] followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed.” Johnson, supra. (punctuation omitted). Here, the trial court’s order resolved Ledet’s claims against Vandamm Enterprises, but did not address Ledet’s claims against the other defendants, and therefore it was not a final order. Moreover, the trial court did not direct the entry of final judgment in accordance with OCGA § 9-11-54 (b). Under these circumstances, Ledet could appeal the order only by following the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Johnson, supra. His failure to follow this procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/09/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Hospital Corporation of America
385 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
George Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-ledet-v-vandamm-enterprises-llc-gactapp-2018.