George K. Hale Mfg. Co. v. Hafleigh & Co.

52 F.2d 714, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3759
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 9, 1931·No. 4487·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

52 F.2d 714 (1931)

GEORGE K. HALE MFG. CO.
v.
HAFLEIGH & CO. et al.

No. 4487.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

September 9, 1931.

*715 *716 *717 *718 *719 J. Preston Swecker and Vernon E. Hodges, both of Washington, D. C., and Albert W. Sanson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Chas. H. Howson and Dexter N. Shaw, both of Philadelphia, Pa. (Bryan A. Hermes, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the trial judge so fully and satisfactorily discusses and properly disposes of every question involved in this case that a further opinion by this court would be but an effort to clothe in different language what has been already said. After careful individual study and joint conference by the members of this court, they all agree in affirming the decree below on that court's opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George K. Hale Mfg. Co. v. Hafleigh & Co., 52 F.2d 714, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3759 (3d Cir. 1931).

52 F.2d 714 (George K. Hale Mfg. Co. v. Hafleigh & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.
101 F.2d 814 (Third Circuit, 1939)
Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.
21 F. Supp. 46 (D. New Jersey, 1937)
Anraku v. General Electric Co.
80 F.2d 958 (Ninth Circuit, 1935)