George E. Safely v. T.I.M.E. Freight, Inc.
This text of 424 F.2d 1367 (George E. Safely v. T.I.M.E. Freight, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
424 F.2d 1367
George E. SAFELY et al., Appellants,
v.
T.I.M.E. FREIGHT, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 14213.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 1, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg; Ted Dalton, Chief Judge, 307 F.Supp. 319.
Flournoy L. Largent, Jr., Winchester, Va. (Largent, Anderson & Larrick, Winchester, Va., on the brief), for appellants.
Robert C. Moss, and John T. Grigsby, Richmond, Va. (McCaul, Grigsby & Pearsall, Richmond, Va., on the brief), for appellee T.I.M.E. Freight, Inc.
Donald M. Murtha, Washington, D. C., on the brief for appellee International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Local Union No. 539.
David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Florian Bartosic, Washington, D. C., on the brief for appellee International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
Before WINTER, CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On consideration of the record and briefs in this appeal we have determined that oral argument is unnecessary. We find no reversible error in the judgment of the district court and accordingly affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 F.2d 1367, 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2047, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-e-safely-v-time-freight-inc-ca4-1970.