George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout
This text of 867 F.2d 1179 (George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
The petition for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court and is denied by reason of the lack of majority of active [1180]*1180judges voting to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Lay, Judges Heaney and McMillian, dissent from the denial of the petition to rehearing the case en banc.
The petition for rehearing is also denied by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
867 F.2d 1179, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2808, 1989 WL 13872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-c-gilmore-v-bill-armontrout-george-c-gilmore-v-bill-armontrout-ca8-1989.