George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout
867 F.2d 1179, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2808, 1989 WL 13872
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 21, 1989·No. 88-1378, 88-1517·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
The petition for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court and is denied by reason of the lack of majority of active [1180] judges voting to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Lay, Judges Heaney and McMillian, dissent from the denial of the petition to rehearing the case en banc.
The petition for rehearing is also denied by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, 867 F.2d 1179, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2808, 1989 WL 13872 (8th Cir. 1989).
867 F.2d 1179 (George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. Lockhart
791 F. Supp. 1388 (E.D. Arkansas, 1992)
Bannister v. Armontrout
807 F. Supp. 516 (W.D. Missouri, 1992)
Buddy Earl Justus v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
897 F.2d 709 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
Jack Edward Newman v. Gerald T. Frey
873 F.2d 1092 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)
George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout
867 F.2d 1179 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)