George A. Manos and Louise G. Manos, Husband and Wife, Manos Amusements, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

187 F.2d 734, 40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 330, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 4045
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 1951
Docket11183
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 187 F.2d 734 (George A. Manos and Louise G. Manos, Husband and Wife, Manos Amusements, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George A. Manos and Louise G. Manos, Husband and Wife, Manos Amusements, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 187 F.2d 734, 40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 330, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 4045 (6th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the respondent had asserted deficiencies in the tax returns of the petitioners for the taxable years 1937, 1938 and 1939, reviewed by the Tax Court in docket No. 15638, and had likewise asserted deficiencies in income tax for 1940 and 1941 and deficiencies in declared value excess profits tax for the taxable years 1940 and 1941 in docket No. 15639, and

*735 It also appearing that no adequate bookkeeping records were maintained by the taxpayers, requiring the respondent to determine income under the so-called “bank deposit method”; and it also appearing from the facts of record and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom by the Tax Court that the taxpayers had failed to overcome the presumption of correctness in the Commissioner’s determination, and that the additional penalties are supported by the record and inferences therefrom,

It is hereby ordered That the decision of the Tax Court is in all respects and upon its findings of fact and its carefully reasoned opinion

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William E. Davis & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner
1981 T.C. Memo. 178 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
First American National Bank v. United States
327 F. Supp. 675 (M.D. Tennessee, 1971)
Adler v. Comm'r
1968 T.C. Memo. 100 (U.S. Tax Court, 1968)
Roark Furniture, Inc. v. Commissioner
1963 T.C. Memo. 51 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
American Metal Products Corp. v. Commissioner
34 T.C. 89 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)
Potter Electric Signal & Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
1960 T.C. Memo. 30 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)
Place v. Commissioner
17 T.C. 199 (U.S. Tax Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 F.2d 734, 40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 330, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 4045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-a-manos-and-louise-g-manos-husband-and-wife-manos-amusements-ca6-1951.