George A. Fuller Co. v. Shelby Fireproofing, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

George A. Fuller Co. v. Shelby Fireproofing, Inc.

171 N.W.2d 589, 18 Mich. App. 601, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1122

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided August 25, 1969·No. Docket No. 6,661·Published

Opinion

Per Ctjriam.

Plaintiff appealed as of right from an order denying motion to consolidate arbitration proceedings or, in the alternative, to compel First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Detroit to arbitrate. First Federal has filed motion to affirm. G-CB, 1963, 817.5(3).

The appeal is determined by this Court’s decision in J. Brodie & Son, Inc. v. George A. Fuller Company (1969), 16 Mich App 137. It is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed, on which decision of the cause depends, are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ctjriam.

Plaintiff appealed as of right from an order denying motion to consolidate arbitration proceedings or, in the alternative, to compel First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Detroit to arbitrate. First Federal has filed motion to affirm. G-CB, 1963, 817.5(3).

The appeal is determined by this Court’s decision in J. Brodie & Son, Inc. v. George A. Fuller Company (1969), 16 Mich App 137. It is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed, on which decision of the cause depends, are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

George A. Fuller Co. v. Shelby Fireproofing, Inc., 171 N.W.2d 589, 18 Mich. App. 601, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1122 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

171 N.W.2d 589 (George A. Fuller Co. v. Shelby Fireproofing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related