Gentala v. City of Tucson

Ninth Circuit

Gentala v. City of Tucson

275 F.3d 1160

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 8, 2002

DocketNos. 97-17062, 97-17069; D.C. No. CV-97-00327-FRZ

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 F.3d 1160 (Gentala v. City of Tucson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gentala v. City of Tucson, 275 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The motion for further briefing and oral argument is DENIED.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Gentala v. City of Tucson, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 340, 151 L.Ed.2d 256 (2001). We remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98, 121 S.Ct. 2093, 150 L.Ed.2d 151 (2000), including such evidentiary proceedings as may be appropriate.

Judge Fernandez dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The motion for further briefing and oral argument is DENIED.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Gentala v. City of Tucson, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 340, 151 L.Ed.2d 256 (2001). We remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98, 121 S.Ct. 2093, 150 L.Ed.2d 151 (2000), including such evidentiary proceedings as may be appropriate.

Judge Fernandez dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 F.3d 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentala-v-city-of-tucson-ca9-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack