Gentala v. City of Tucson

Ninth Circuit

Gentala v. City of Tucson

275 F.3d 1160

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 8, 2002·No. Nos. 97-17062, 97-17069; D.C. No. CV-97-00327-FRZ·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The motion for further briefing and oral argument is DENIED.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Gentala v. City of Tucson, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 340, 151 L.Ed.2d 256 (2001). We remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98, 121 S.Ct. 2093, 150 L.Ed.2d 151 (2000), including such evidentiary proceedings as may be appropriate.

Judge Fernandez dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The motion for further briefing and oral argument is DENIED.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Gentala v. City of Tucson, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 340, 151 L.Ed.2d 256 (2001). We remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98, 121 S.Ct. 2093, 150 L.Ed.2d 151 (2000), including such evidentiary proceedings as may be appropriate.

Judge Fernandez dissents.

Gentala v. City of Tucson, 275 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

275 F.3d 1160 (Gentala v. City of Tucson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related