Gentala v. City of Tucson
222 F.3d 614, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9211, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6950, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21065
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gentala v. City of Tucson. Read the opinion of the Court — 275 F.3d 1160 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2000·No. Nos. 97-17062, 97-17069·Published
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard the the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth [615]*615Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gentala v. City of Tucson, 222 F.3d 614, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9211, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6950, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21065 (9th Cir. 2000).
222 F.3d 614 (Gentala v. City of Tucson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.