General Motors Corp. v. Erves

395 Mich. 923, 1976 Mich. LEXIS 355

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in General Motors Corp. v. Erves. Read the opinion of the Court — 399 Mich. 241 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 1976·No. Docket Nos. 55138-55141·Published

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion it is ordered that these appeals be and the [924]*924same are hereby resubmitted for decision, without further argument or briefing by the parties.

J. R. Wheatley, for plaintiff-appellant. John A. Fillion, Jordan Rossen, Edwin G. Fabré, Ralph O. Jones, Leonard Page, Anne Trebilcock, Marley Weiss, and M. Jay Whitman, for defendants-appellees Bloomer, Kartsonas, and Erves. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Felix E. League, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellee Michigan Employment Security Commission.

Reported at 395 Mich 604.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion it is ordered that these appeals be and the [924]*924same are hereby resubmitted for decision, without further argument or briefing by the parties.

Reported at 395 Mich 604.

General Motors Corp. v. Erves, 395 Mich. 923, 1976 Mich. LEXIS 355 (Mich. 1976).

Pincite

395 Mich. 923 (General Motors Corp. v. Erves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

General Motors Corp. v. Erves

236 N.W.2d 432 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1975)

Opinion

Related