General Construction Co. v. Fisher
295 U.S. 715, 55 S. Ct. 646
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Trinityfarm Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514; Lucas v. Howard, 280 U. S. 526; Lucas v. Reed, 281 U. S. 699; Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 514; Willcuts v. Bunn, 282 U. S. 224, et seq.; Baltimore Shipbuilding Co. v. Baltimore, 195 U. S. 375, 382.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
General Construction Co. v. Fisher, 295 U.S. 715, 55 S. Ct. 646 (1935).
295 U.S. 715 (General Construction Co. v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Short v. D. R. B. Logging Co.
235 P.2d 340 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1951)
E. E. Morgan Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Phillips County
314 U.S. 571 (Supreme Court, 1941)
Atkinson v. State Tax Comm'n of Ore.
303 U.S. 20 (Supreme Court, 1938)
James v. Dravo Contracting Co.
302 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Silas Mason, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
61 P.2d 1269 (Washington Supreme Court, 1936)