E. E. Morgan Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Phillips County
314 U.S. 571, 62 S. Ct. 77
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula, 309 U. S. 94, 105; James v. Dravo Contracting Co., 302 U. S. 134, 149; General Construction Co. v. Fisher, 295 U. S. 715; Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; (2) International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 579, 588-[572]*57289; Natural Gas Co. v. Slattery, 302 U. S. 300, 306-7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. E. Morgan Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Phillips County, 314 U.S. 571, 62 S. Ct. 77 (1941).
314 U.S. 571 (E. E. Morgan Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Phillips County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
International Harvester Co. of America v. Kentucky
234 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. Grosjean
291 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 1934)
James v. Dravo Contracting Co.
302 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Slattery
302 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1937)
James Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula
309 U.S. 94 (Supreme Court, 1940)
General Construction Co. v. Fisher
295 U.S. 715 (Supreme Court, 1935)