General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Wyble

Louisiana Court of Appeal

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Wyble

119 So. 2d 648, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1446

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 25, 1960

DocketNo. 21554

StatusPublished

This text of 119 So. 2d 648 (General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Wyble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Wyble, 119 So. 2d 648, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1446 (La. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, obtained a judgment against the defendant, Berdine J. Wy-ble, after which she appealed suspensively and devolutively. In conformity with an order of the lower court, defendant furnished an appeal bond, executed by a personal surety.

Plaintiff then filed a rule to test the sufficiency of the bond to which defendant filed no answer. The rule was made absolute and plaintiff was ordered to furnish an adequate bond within ten days from February 23, 1960 or the appeal was to be dismissed.

[649]*649On March 10, 1960, plaintiff-appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that defendant failed to furnish sufficient bond and defendant failed to reply thereto. On its face, the record supports this motion, and if there he any defense, we have not been apprised of it.¹

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss this appeal is sustained and this appeal ordered dismissed.

Motion to dismiss sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, obtained a judgment against the defendant, Berdine J. Wy-ble, after which she appealed suspensively and devolutively. In conformity with an order of the lower court, defendant furnished an appeal bond, executed by a personal surety.

Plaintiff then filed a rule to test the sufficiency of the bond to which defendant filed no answer. The rule was made absolute and plaintiff was ordered to furnish an adequate bond within ten days from February 23, 1960 or the appeal was to be dismissed.

[649]*649On March 10, 1960, plaintiff-appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that defendant failed to furnish sufficient bond and defendant failed to reply thereto. On its face, the record supports this motion, and if there he any defense, we have not been apprised of it.¹

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss this appeal is sustained and this appeal ordered dismissed.

Motion to dismiss sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 So. 2d 648, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-accident-fire-life-assurance-corp-v-wyble-lactapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack