Chatman v. Jacobs

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Chatman v. Jacobs

130 So. 368, 14 La. App. 581, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 286

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 20, 1930

DocketNo. 13,563

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 130 So. 368 (Chatman v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chatman v. Jacobs, 130 So. 368, 14 La. App. 581, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 286 (La. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WESTEREIELD, J.

The basis of ’this motion is the failure of defendant and "appellant to furnish a proper appeal bond following a judgment of the lower. court declaring the surety on the original bond to be without the qualifications required by law, and ordering the defendant to furnish a new bond in accordance with the, provisions of Act 112 of 1916 as amended by Act 284 of 1928. When the motion was called for trial in this court no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant nor were we favored with any brief, consequently we are unaware of the character., of defense, if any there be, to the motion to dismiss, which seems to us to be well founded and must prevail. ■

For the reasons assigned the motion t.o dismiss the appeal is sustained and this appeal ordered dismissed. •,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WESTEREIELD, J.

The basis of ’this motion is the failure of defendant and "appellant to furnish a proper appeal bond following a judgment of the lower. court declaring the surety on the original bond to be without the qualifications required by law, and ordering the defendant to furnish a new bond in accordance with the, provisions of Act 112 of 1916 as amended by Act 284 of 1928. When the motion was called for trial in this court no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant nor were we favored with any brief, consequently we are unaware of the character., of defense, if any there be, to the motion to dismiss, which seems to us to be well founded and must prevail. ■

For the reasons assigned the motion t.o dismiss the appeal is sustained and this appeal ordered dismissed. •,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 So. 368, 14 La. App. 581, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chatman-v-jacobs-lactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack