Genao v. City of New York

Opinion

UNL OUINT DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:_ 10/17/2022 GABINO GENAO, Plaintiff, 1:20-cv-4872-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendants informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 93]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by November 17, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: October 17, 2022 MARY/AY 7p i New York, NY United States District Judge